More families moving in together during housing crisis

by Rosie
3 February 2009

People are dealing with the housing crisis in many different ways. Some are going the unethical route, walking away from homes that have declined in value, leaving their unpaid mortgage bills behind. Others are renting their homes out instead of putting them on the market. Still others are working out deals with their mortgage lenders to reduce their monthly mortgage payments.

Then there are the folks profiled in a recent USA Today story: They’re surviving the economic slump and the housing crisis by moving in with other family members.

According to the USA Today story, a growing number of relatives are moving under the same roof. Unfortunately, these moves aren’t made because families want to spend more time together; It’s a move borne out of economic necessity.

Some are moving into relatives’ homes because they’ve already lost their own residence to foreclosure. Others are doing it because they can no longer qualify for a mortgage loan in these days of stricter lending standards. Other groups of siblings and relatives are moving in together to pool their dollars, so that they can all benefit from having a home.

This situation doesn’t seem too unusual to me. Back when I was a kid — way too many year ago — my grandmother and uncle both lived with us. That made three kids, two parents and two extended family members living in a home that measured just a bit under 2,000 square feet. Funny thing is, I never felt crowded or cramped. Now, my parents might have, but as for me? I was happy as could be.

I often think back to my cozy childhood home whenever I see a sprawling McMansion profiled in our local newspaper or on one of the cable TV home-improvement shows. Today’s new construction homes are often far too large for the small family that lives in them. I’ve always thought giant homes were largely a waste. How often, after all, is that extra bedroom or spare entertaining area really used?

I know the extended families profiled in the USA Today story aren’t living together because they want to. But still, there isn’t something nice about having extended family members around, especially in trying times like the ones we’re suffering through now.

If you enjoyed, share it!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • del.icio.us
  • Ma.gnolia
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Related posts

3 Comments
3 February 2009

Hi, cool site, good writing ;)

3 February 2009

“Some are going the unethical route, walking away from homes that have declined in value, leaving their unpaid mortgage bills behind”

which is the rout tht envolves giving up your home after recieving a crappy loan and baited into agreements that never made really sense for eanyone?

” often think back to my cozy childhood home whenever I see a sprawling McMansion profiled in our local newspaper or on one of the cable TV home-improvement shows”

Satire?

This is funny. You go the right words, defaulting, immoral, mcmansion, you just confused the order.

3 February 2009

Hi, Raj:

Thanks for writing. I meant no disrespect to those homeowners who were misled into bad mortgage products. I know this happens. Our mortgage lender was convinced that an interest-only loan would have been perfect for my wife and I when we bought our home three years ago. Fortunately, we stuck with a fixed-rate loan.

But there are many other buyers who did stretch themselves too thin just to purchase a home that was beyond their means. When these people walk away from a home and their responsibilities, I can’t think of any word other than “unethical” to describe their behavior.

And as far as McMansions go, I do think it is foolish to purchase, and to build, such giant, sprawling homes. U.S. residents have gotten too wrapped up in having the perfect kitchen, the ideal master bathroom. We’ve become spoiled, and it’s all coming back to haunt us now.

Dan
http://community.enormo.com/blog

Leave a comment

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.